Heff, they say that when a person willingly enters the public eye, such as in politics, the details of their private lives becomes fair game for ridicule and satire. Personally, I think when a person enters politics the public should also be allowed to rename them based on their behavior. In Weiner's case, his last name wouldn't change at all. But his first name would become 'Douchebag'
Baboo, I want all that free money that you get to spend on whores and trips to Ireland and Europe and whores and free houses for all your friends and whores!
Ute, I will leave it to you to research all the photos of his political package and let us know your final opinion. Junk shots are just not for me. I'm more of a breast man.
I don't know is what Weiner did better or worse than what Clinton did in his Oval Orifice? Moral quandry eh? Is sexting/sending pics of a donkey dong worse than 'not haveing sex wtih that woman' and squirting on a dress?
Roxy, I don't know the full extent of the weird things Weiner did, and to be honest, there has been a lot of debate about whether this really has any bearing on his role as a Congressman, especially since far bigger douchebags are still in office, like Barney Frank and Henry Waxman and Frank Lautenberg. But elections aren't far away, and the Democratic Party is the Socialist Feminist Party, so anything a male does in the eyes of that party is either given a total pass, or completely and unconditionally condemned as proof that males are evil and testosterone is of the devil. Either way, it's not really my battle. I don't care anything about the guy. I think The Press enjoys the story simply for the outrageous headlines they are getting away with printing. There are so many things you can do with the word 'Weiner' in a headline, you know?
Ah, the LOVELY world of politics.
ReplyDeleteALL their last names should be "Weiner", like the latest douchebag, in my opinion.
Heff, they say that when a person willingly enters the public eye, such as in politics, the details of their private lives becomes fair game for ridicule and satire. Personally, I think when a person enters politics the public should also be allowed to rename them based on their behavior. In Weiner's case, his last name wouldn't change at all. But his first name would become 'Douchebag'
ReplyDeleteI wonts ta run fo'orrifice, 'cause Ima BigO' Dick !
ReplyDeleteBaboo, I want all that free money that you get to spend on whores and trips to Ireland and Europe and whores and free houses for all your friends and whores!
ReplyDeleteHis political package is worth a look. :o)
ReplyDeleteUte, I will leave it to you to research all the photos of his political package and let us know your final opinion. Junk shots are just not for me. I'm more of a breast man.
ReplyDeleteI don't know is what Weiner did better or worse than what Clinton did in his Oval Orifice? Moral quandry eh? Is sexting/sending pics of a donkey dong worse than 'not haveing sex wtih that woman' and squirting on a dress?
ReplyDeleteRoxy, I don't know the full extent of the weird things Weiner did, and to be honest, there has been a lot of debate about whether this really has any bearing on his role as a Congressman, especially since far bigger douchebags are still in office, like Barney Frank and Henry Waxman and Frank Lautenberg. But elections aren't far away, and the Democratic Party is the Socialist Feminist Party, so anything a male does in the eyes of that party is either given a total pass, or completely and unconditionally condemned as proof that males are evil and testosterone is of the devil. Either way, it's not really my battle. I don't care anything about the guy. I think The Press enjoys the story simply for the outrageous headlines they are getting away with printing. There are so many things you can do with the word 'Weiner' in a headline, you know?
ReplyDelete